Introduction

This case study analyses the correct use of qualification, selection and award criteria in public procurement in Romania, highlighting common misuses and their impact on competition and transparency.

What This Analysis Includes

It outlines the legal distinctions between categories of criteria, common errors such as disproportionate requirements or overlapping selection and award criteria, and the consequences of changing award criteria during the procedure.

Who Should Read

The analysis is useful for legal advisors, procurement experts, tenderers and contracting authorities, providing practical guidance for conducting fair, efficient and legal procedures.

Download the Full Case Study

The full version includes relevant excerpts from CNSC decisions, legal arguments on technical-financial inconsistencies and best practice recommendations for preparing compliant tender documentation.

Need Legal Assistance?

Contact our team for personalised legal assistance in public procurement procedures and challenges by email at office@sarbupartners.ro.