Challenging Arbital Awards in Romania
Introduction This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal framework and procedural mechanisms for challenging arbitral awards in Romania,…

Introduction This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal framework and procedural mechanisms for challenging arbitral awards in Romania,…
This case study analyses the correct use of qualification, selection and award criteria in public procurement in Romania, highlighting common misuses and their impact on competition and transparency.
This study provides an in-depth analysis of the possibility to introduce subcontractors during the performance of public procurement contracts under Romanian law, considering the current legal framework and relevant case law. It highlights the regulatory provisions, conditions for subcontractor involvement, and the practical implications for contract execution.
This case study examines a relevant decision delivered by Romania’s National Council for Solving Complaints (CNSC), focusing on a critical issue in public procurement procedures: the impact of amendments to the tender documentation during the bidding period. The case highlights the practical consequences of inconsistencies between the technical and financial proposals resulting from a misinterpretation of the contracting authority’s amendment notice.
Introduction This guide offers a comprehensive and practical overview of the legal remedies available before the National Council for Solving Complaints…