The study examines the applicable legal framework, primarily the provisions of Law no. 58/1934 and the regulations issued by the The National Bank of Romania, highlighting both bill-of-exchange procedures (direct action, recourse action, and bill enforcement) and extra-bill remedies, such as the causal action or unjust enrichment claim.
The study examines the applicable legal framework, primarily the provisions of Law no. 58/1934 and the regulations issued by the The National Bank of Romania, highlighting both bill-of-exchange procedures (direct action, recourse action, and bill enforcement) and extra-bill remedies, such as the causal action or unjust enrichment claim.
This study offers a comprehensive analysis of the legal framework and procedural mechanisms governing the challenge of arbitral awards in Romania, as regulated by the Romanian Civil Procedure Code (RCPC).
This case study analyses the correct use of qualification, selection and award criteria in public procurement in Romania, highlighting common misuses and their impact on competition and transparency.
This study provides an in-depth analysis of the possibility to introduce subcontractors during the performance of public procurement contracts under Romanian law, considering the current legal framework and relevant case law. It highlights the regulatory provisions, conditions for subcontractor involvement, and the practical implications for contract execution.
This case study examines a relevant decision delivered by Romania’s National Council for Solving Complaints (CNSC), focusing on a critical issue in public procurement procedures: the impact of amendments to the tender documentation during the bidding period. The case highlights the practical consequences of inconsistencies between the technical and financial proposals resulting from a misinterpretation of the contracting authority’s amendment notice.